Claims Review 47
Claims Review 47 (simplified Chinese)
Affichant les résultats 1 à 10 sur 17
18/10/2022
Welcome to the October edition of ITIC’s Claims Review. The first Claims Review of the new Carolean age.
A Ship Sanitation Control Exemption Certificate (“SSCEC”) was due to expire in two months’ time. The ship manager made inquiries for renewal of the SSCEC at the next port.
A shipbroker acted for both the owners and charterers in a fixture. Different shipbrokers within the company acted for each party.
A shipbroker advised ITIC that they were owed US$ 68,000 of commission from a sale and purchase of a ship.
Charlotte Kirk, ITIC’s commercial director, sits down to chat with the Claims Review editor, as part of this regular interview series in which we get to know ITIC’s claims handlers. In this interview Charlotte explains why the “frozen fish claim” is the most memorable claim she has handled and shares her love of all things water/boat related.
A hub agent was appointed as the ship’s protective agent by the owner. The charterer was an oil major.
A commercial manager was held responsible by owners for failing to arrange a pre-departure survey for the fouling of the hull. The ship had had an extended stay at a port and that created a requirement to check for marine growth.
Following the discharge of the cargo from a ship a shipbroker was presented with an invoice for heating expenses amounting to US$ 70,000 by the owners to be passed on to the charterers.
A ship agent based at a transhipment port was required to submit a declaration to customs authorities in respect of a container of 990 cases of cigarettes being transhipped at that port.
A designer was appointed to provide outline design services in respect of an upgrade to a ferry service and then to advise the client on technical matters during the subsequent build.