Affichant les résultats 111 à 120 sur 578
20/10/2020
A shipbroker had previously arranged a fixture between the same principals with discharging in north China.
ITIC insured a naval architect in Australia, who was also insured as a surveyor for small commercial vessel coding approval on behalf of the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA).
A ship agent failed to manifest a cargo, which was a yacht, at the original port of loading. At the second port on the voyage the customs inspectors identified the error and seized the yacht.
A shipbroker was asked to assist a buyer to place a bid in a judicial auction.
In the last Claims Review we offered you the opportunity to “Ask the Editor”. Here are a some of the questions that we have been asked.
13/07/2020
A naval architect was engaged to make modifications to a ship. The modifications included an additional 67 person accommodation unit.
A naval architect designed a series of motor yachts for a yard. As part of the design contract, they were required to provide a drawing showing the down flooding points of the yacht. This drawing was to be provided on an “as built” basis. However, the drawing was never provided.
25/03/2020
Welcome to the Spring edition of ITIC’s Claims Review, April 2020. The Claims Review provides a selection of cases recently handled by ITIC.
A port agent was owed US$ 190,000 by a lumber company, the consignee of a cargo of lumber, in respect of both storage and demurrage charges.
During the course of fixing a ship, the owner’s commercial manager provided a warranty to the potential charterer that the ship had not traded to Sudan in the past three years.